Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats or other animals as members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Regarding the relationship between human and animals, particularly pets, I am strongly inclined to take the side of this behavior based on the psychological reasons. A fastidious survey in the origin of this behavior reveals that animals have been an inseparable part of human life from antediluvian to modern era. In addition to their benefits in providing some entertainment or kind of amusement, they deeply diffuse in human heart and keep people away from some absurd activity such as intensified depression. Besides, they reveal a protective role in the life of family. To elaborate more on the topic mentioned, the following analytical reasons and examples will be presented.
First and foremost, the animals can provide a positive atmosphere in a family. Animals such as birds and pets do some special behaviors and most of the people like them. For instance, an energetic pet can attract attention of the family by jumping up and down or a small bird can provide a comfortable condition by singing a beautiful song. Psychologically speaking, these events will eliminate the pressure of the modern life, prohibit alone human from mental diseases and energize them positively. A family members who are tired of traffic, noise pollution and harsh stress can find a pleasant time among their pets. As a result, this kind of relationship does highly matter when it comes to escape from the modern life stress.
Another primary reason can be attributed to the role of these animals as a protective member of a family. Needless to say, the sensitivity of animals is much more influential compared to human. They react to different phenomena based on their senses. For example, before earth quake the song of bird would intensify or pets start to bark. Besides, they show this behavior when they feel a foreigner comes to their zone. It is obvious that some family signifies their home animals as an alarming system. There is a deluge of examples and stories that dogs save the life of the children in a confrontation with a serious danger. As excavated findings reveal, their protective role is not a new thing and has a depth root even as the time of human emergence. Therefore, this positive role can be indicated as a respond that why people keep pets as a member of their family.
To recapitulate, I cannot agree more with the positive role of pets, bird, etc in human life. I put an emphasis on the critical role of keeping pets to bring about some entertainment in human life and or reveal some protective actions. To my best knowledge, their benefits are so remarkable that the number of family keep the pets or bird in their home is about to explosion. Although keeping them has some conditions and prerequisites, and no one has a permission to bring about some interference for their neighbors as well, considering the rights of people in a society, I believe they can keep in a legal situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 807, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... this positive role can be indicated as a respond that why people keep pets as a member o...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2421.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9008097166 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82107009133 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491902834008 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 797.4 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5119515829 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.875 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240455813365 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709688089702 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052761649492 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156411070663 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514981450899 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.