TPO 49
The reading massage lists three reasons to support that humpback whales take advance of stars to navigate during the migration, while the professor in the lecture thinks all three evidence is unconvincing.
The first view the lecturer argue is that there is no direct connection between intelligent and the ability to use a complicated system to navigate. Some birds, like ducks, are able to navigate by sensory stimuli but ducks have average intelligent. The ability is instinct. That is to say, the opinion in the reading that the high intelligence indicates humpback whales can use stars to navigate is not convincing.
Secondly, the reading holds the claim that the straight lines made by humpbacks whales mean they rely on external signs like starts. The professor, however, mentions that there is a different explanation that they actually use Earth magnetic field as the external force. Humpback whales' brains have a special area that is sensitive to the magnetic field and use it to navigate. Thus, the professor fights against the point of view in the reading again.
Finally, the professor represents his idea that spy-hopping has nothing to do with navigation because other non-migration animals, like sharks, have the same behaviour. They may look for food by doing spy-hopping. Plus, humpback whales do this behaviour most during the daytime when must stars cannot be seen, which is far away from the suggestion in the reading that they do spy-hopping for looking at the stars during migration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humpbacks'' or 'humpback's'?
Suggestion: humpbacks'; humpback's
...e claim that the straight lines made by humpbacks whales mean they rely on external signs...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68176000692 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583673469388 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1789674958 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.166666667 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373721912444 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12739086542 0.0996497079465 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776791464435 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20098285994 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654785031367 0.0443174109184 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.