In the lecture, the professor makes a series of points that cast doubt on the all the arguments presented in the reading passage about the migration of hump whale by star. The lecturer states none of the evidences in the reading is convincing.
First, the professor states the intelligence and navigation are not related to each other. He gives the example of ducks and birds which migrate but are not very intelligent and in fact have average intelligent. They find their way by instinct not their intellectual abilities. This refutes the claim of author that connects migration to overall intelligence and states the hump whale due to high intelligent animal use star for navigation.
Second, the professor says the straight line usage of whales for navigation is not due to external object and they use magnetic field for their movement and being in line. The whales have bio magnetic in their head which is sensation to magnetic field and be oriented by it. It is contradicted to the claim of the writer about sun and star as external object for navigation.
Third, the speaker states the hump whales navigation is nothing to do by looking the stars. He states shark also migrate and they look to the star for their hunting and even in the day whales look to the star and this is pure speculation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, look, second, so, third, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 226.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80973451327 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60243580065 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495575221239 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 335.7 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5147353969 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8181818182 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343368318243 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126171731315 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756931084429 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204697524103 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763306672069 0.0443174109184 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.