In the lecture, the professor presents responses to the critisism to TED equipement in shrimper boat. She states using TED is very good way to keep the turtles safe and has to be avital equipement for every shrimper boat.
First of all, she points out that it is true that turtles get trapped rarely but every year thousands of boat go out around the coast to cast the nets. Even one turtle per boat can caught 1000 turtle in year which is lots of endangered species. So a small cost is more desirable than endangering turtles.
Moreover, the speaker states making time limit for shrimper boat to keep their net underwater for protecting sea turtle is a good idea but only in theory. In reality, controling lots of boat far out the sea is not easy and monitoring is impossible. Therefore, TED is much easier way to control them and is effective.
Lastly, the professor says that it is true that standard TED provide small passage and hence for larger turtles are ineffective and they can not escape passage.However by making larger TED this problem would be solved easily.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In the lecture, the professor presents responses to the critisism to TED equipe...
^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually put before the verb 'trapped'.
Suggestion: rarely trapped
...ts out that it is true that turtles get trapped rarely but every year thousands of boat go out...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 178, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun boat seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of boats'.
Suggestion: lots of boats
... only in theory. In reality, controling lots of boat far out the sea is not easy and monitor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...fective and they can not escape passage.However by making larger TED this problem would...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, lastly, moreover, so, therefore, as to, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 1373.03311258 65% => OK
No of words: 189.0 270.72406181 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7037037037 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53476154637 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 419.366225166 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8466989673 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7777777778 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2222222222 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.