The text states that a travel to Mras is not possible like former manned travel travel to the moon. Conversely, the professor believes that it is absoloutely challenging, but nop impossible. He offers three counter-arguments to demonstrate weaknesses of each presumptions provided by the text on inpracticality of a trip to the Mars.
The first paragraph asserts that the travel to the moon took only afew days but for the ars is it takes two years, and it is not possible to carry required supplies. In contrast, he lecturer mentions that Hydroponic cultivation can solve this problem. She explain that in this method plants root will be placed on the water instead of soil, and this have many benefits. It can feed them, and likewise in this way they can recycle the wasteater and use it as drinking water. Moreover plants release oxygen which makes fresh air to astrounants. This directly contradicts the first assumption of the text.
The second part of the reading points out that scientist experience prolonged presence in the zero-gravity environment and this is dangerous for their health. The professor disproves this theory by suggesting that there are many astronounts in the space stations which is orbitting the earth, and that specific strategies solev this problem. For instance there are some kinds of exercises and some special diets which avoids adverse effects of this phenomena.
The last portion of the text says that spacecarft are not protected from radiation that comes from the Sun and it is dangerous for scientist. Once again, the lecturer rejects this reason. He emphasizes that eventhough the solar radiation are dangerous for health, they are not a serious concern in a space travel. He continues that, solar radiation does not happend always and a device can detect them. If a shelter space be designed, astronouts can go in it in space can be designed in the
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'travel'.
Suggestion: travel
The text states that a travel to Mras is not possible like former man...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: travel
...Mras is not possible like former manned travel travel to the moon. Conversely, the professor ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 256, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'explains'.
Suggestion: explains
...cultivation can solve this problem. She explain that in this method plants root will be...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 474, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...wasteater and use it as drinking water. Moreover plants release oxygen which makes fresh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...l diets which avoids adverse effects of this phenomena. The last portion of the tex...
^^^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'space travel'.
Suggestion: space travel
...alth, they are not a serious concern in a space travel. He continues that, solar radiation doe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, likewise, moreover, second, so, for instance, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 315.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0126984127 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81379103791 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.273978604 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8823529412 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5294117647 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.