TPO 51 task 1

Essay topics:

TPO 51 task 1

The passage presents some hypotheses about elephants' characteristics. The lecture, nonetheless, provides reasons and examples in opposites of ideas discussed by the article and refutes them all.

First of all, the passage alleges that elephants could realize when they are near to death. It explains that as they get older and weaker, they left their herd and set alone near a leak. In contrast, the professor brings up this idea that this action by elephants should not be perceived that they know they are going to die. Elephants do this because as they get older, their teeth become more smooth and they cannot chew strong plants, so they leave their herds and find smoother plants that probably grow near the water.

Second, the article claims that elephants have the artistic ability, and can paint some wonderful objects. The professor, on the contrary, highlights this fact that elephants trained to paint something like this and they just paint these objects because their trainer learns them to move the brush in a certain way their sensitive ears are touched. She explains more and says that elephants' ears are more sensitive, and trainer by taking the advantages of this characteristic to stimulate the elephants to repeat the same movements they have done.

Finally, the author expresses the old belief among people that elephants have a fear of mice. The article provides a test in which elephants confronted with several mics and get afraid. The speaker dismisses this idea and explains that such behavior in elephants are mostly because they are not familiar with mices and they seem strange to elephants.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ces and they seem strange to elephants.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, nonetheless, second, so, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12734082397 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47915746116 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558052434457 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0557927185 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.083333333 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.