four days working

Essay topics:

four days working

Both passage and lecture argue about new idea of reducing employees work time from five days per week to four days per week. the passage claim thant this new method results in increasing workers lifestyle ans is benefitial fot them, however, the professor is disagree with it. the main reasons in the reading and its corresponding contradication opinion mentioned in the passage, has been provided as follow.

first, the author alleged that reducing working time, increasing employees'rest and lesuire time. and also, it can increase hireing rate to compensate the difference between amount of work done by four-days and five days working. On the other hand, the professor beilieve that, four day working led to increasing company cost, because hiring more workers required more medical and health cost for each indevidual newly employed worker, and also increasing number of workers attributie the more number of working suppliment, computer, desk, etc, for instance.

second, it has beem mentioned in the passage that, decreasing working hour will increase workers joy of life and provide them more leisure time to do their work, however. as quted in the lecture, this may increase the employeer expectation and make them to ask the workers to perform and done the same work defined in five days in the four days, which harm workers health condition and make working atmosphere unpleasent to them. moreover, it would decrease the rate of employing as managements and company owners intendent and prefer to pay low to their employees and recuirte less workers, further in some jobs, like manager it is neccesary that the worker present at the position constantly and two person for this kind of jobs is not favorable.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ve days per week to four days per week. the passage claim thant this new method res...
^^^
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...t this new method results in increasing workers lifestyle ans is benefitial fot them, h...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...ial fot them, however, the professor is disagree with it. the main reasons in the readin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...ioned in the passage, has been provided as follow. first, the author alleged that redu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...assage, has been provided as follow. first, the author alleged that reducing worki...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...reasing employeesrest and lesuire time. and also, it can increase hireing rate to c...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
... computer, desk, etc, for instance. second, it has beem mentioned in the passage t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...leisure time to do their work, however. as quted in the lecture, this may increase...
^^
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
... working atmosphere unpleasent to them. moreover, it would decrease the rate of employin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 579, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun workers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...pay low to their employees and recuirte less workers, further in some jobs, like man...
^^^^
Line 5, column 703, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...sent at the position constantly and two person for this kind of jobs is not favorable....
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, for instance, kind of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15714285714 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59351624838 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603571428571 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.0836258771 49.2860985944 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.444444444 110.228320801 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1111111111 21.698381199 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8888888889 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362599736977 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165142732955 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149364786843 0.0662205650399 226% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263248768697 0.162205337803 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647769722951 0.0443174109184 146% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.3589403974 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.0289183223 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:

para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3

Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).

Don't need a conclusion paragraph.

Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster


Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.