How to save Torreya tree from extinction in north Florida
The passage presents some ideas and solutions to save a types of tree in the north Florida. The professor, nonetheless, provide some reasons and examples to cast doubt on the suggested idea in the reading.
First, The reading claims that reestablish the Torreya tree in the same location in Florida which its microclimate are very favorable to the tree; however, the lecture expresses that global warming causes Florida region become dryer and other same location is not a suitable place for reestablishing the tree, and the mentioned solution in the article would not be efficient.
The reading second option offers that the tree will be survived, if it is displaced to an entire different location - far from its microclimate- as it can thrive and grow better in norther region. In contrast, the speaker refute this mentioned assertion. She states that replanting and moving a plant to another location results in damage to domestic plant in that region and causes them in the danger of extinction.
Finally, the author alleged that the Torreya will be successfully preserved and survived in the research center because it is far from the wild environment. The professor, in contrary, bring up the criticism that research centers capacity is not adequate enough to preserve this type of planet, and make it resistance to disease.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a type' or simply 'types'?
Suggestion: a type; types
...esents some ideas and solutions to save a types of tree in the north Florida. The profe...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...net, and make it resistance to disease.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 218.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1880733945 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7630740299 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596330275229 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.1740504524 49.2860985944 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.375 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 21.698381199 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218808220438 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808292381471 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997687014208 0.0662205650399 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115811852409 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578525906832 0.0443174109184 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.