Workers who prefer to work four days a week instead of the current hours

Essay topics:

Workers who prefer to work four days a week instead of the current hours.

The reading passages stated that companies in The United States would implement new policy for employees who decide to work four days a week instead of the current five days work week. Meanwhile, the lecturer casted doubt about this new policy would result, the lecturer mentioned some warning that this decision might have not been mentioned by the reading.

First, the reading claimed that shortened work days would increase company profits, since employees would be more rested and alert, therefore, would make fewer errors. However, the lecturer stated that companies would be forced to spend more money. If they hire new employees, they will have to pay for training, extra medical benefits, create more office space, and also buy more computers. As a result, the company would be spending more money than making profits.

Second, according to the reading this new policy would decrease the unemployment rate. Once more full-time workers began to work four days a week, some of their responsibilities would be transferred to others. The lecturer opposed this condition because the company would increase their expectations. Companies would expect that an employee who works eighty percent would do the same job as a full-time worker, creating an unpleasant and overloaded routine of work.

At last, the reading stated that workers who work four days a week would improve their quality of life. The lecturer disagreed, stating that workers who work four days a week are likely to experience economic instability. Also, expose them to be the first who lose their job in case of a crisis. Besides the fact, companies would not be interested in promoting them, preferring a worker who works full-time to ensure supervision of the entire work week.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20422535211 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53829038367 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524647887324 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7232461955 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.571428571 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315254553971 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132768509276 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149199471459 0.0662205650399 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22400357336 0.162205337803 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141967964415 0.0443174109184 320% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.