TPO 52 Asteroid as colonization option
The reading passage and the listening section are both discussing about building the colonization in asteroids. The article proposes some reasonable statements, however, the speaker casts doubt with it and delve into some reasons and examples to refute it.
First of all, the article mentions that asteroids have low gravity, which can assist people to carry less materials and easier to take off and land on the surface. However, the speaker disagrees with this statement. The low gravity causes people have health problems. When people stay a while in the low gravity condition, these people will lose muscle and lower the bone density. As a result, the low gravity is not a compelling reason for people to dwell.
Secondly, the article indicates that asteroids contains considerable valuable elements which made the colonization seems profitable. Nonetheless, the speaker disapproves of this argument and says it is not a whole picture. Because the transportation and the supply cost may surplus the profit. Moreover, the price may not remain the same as the price when these rare elements before discovered.
Last but not least, the speaker refutes the idea provided by the article that the asteroids are simple to arrive. Some asteroids probably close to the Earth but asteroids' orbit are unusual. This means the distance from Earth to the place where the people colonized is different. As the result, it might be easy for people to reach the colonization but hard to return.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun materials is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...avity, which can assist people to carry less materials and easier to take off and la...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, well, while, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18257261411 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65260463663 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56846473029 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1809058382 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2666666667 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0666666667 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241506007206 0.272083759551 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757049189935 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670212856793 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136396225151 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765427093119 0.0443174109184 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.