TPO 53
The passage and the lecture discuss the benefits of high taxes that governments set on some unhealthy products like a cigarette. The reading presents three reasons why setting high taxes for these unhealthy behaviors is a good idea. Whereas, the professor in the lecture challenges all of them and believes none of them is convincing.
First, the reading claims a high amount of taxes will discourage people from smoking cigarettes and eating unhealthy food. However, the lecture argues against this opinion. She points out that high taxes would lead people to buy cheaper low-quality things that will have greater health risks.
Second, the passage states these kinds of taxes are financially fair because people who use cigarettes and unhealthy foods would get sick and they will create medical costs. However, the lecturer disagrees with this idea. She believes fairness doesn't define in that way and setting high taxes isn't fair at all. According to the lecture, this isn't fair at all that people with lower incomes pay the same amount of taxes that people with higher incomes pay.
Finally, the reading claims the high rate of taxation on cigarettes would significantly increase the revenue of the governments. However, the professor in the lecture refutes this idea completely because these high amounts of money will make the governments greatly dependent. Thus, the governments that wait for that amount of money each month would set some rules that ban smoking in some public areas like parks and other public centers.
Although the letter presents three reasons why setting high taxes on some unhealthy products like a cigarette is a good idea, the professor challenges all of them and explains why none of them are convincing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s with this idea. She believes fairness doesnt define in that way and setting high tax...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...fine in that way and setting high taxes isnt fair at all. According to the lecture, ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... at all. According to the lecture, this isnt fair at all that people with lower inco...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16961130742 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44762847268 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47703180212 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9033084686 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 7.06452816374 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.