TPO 53 Writing Integrated
Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes; similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods. The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of social benefits.
First of all, the taxes discourage people from indulging in unhealthy behaviors. Raising taxes on cigarettes, for instance, leads people to buy fewer of them. Smoking has declined as taxes on tobacco have risen, showing that these taxes do work to make society healthier. It can be expected that imposing similar taxes on unhealthy food and beverages would help reduce obesity rates.
Second, taxes of this kind are financially fair. When people get sick as a result of their smoking or eating unhealthy foods, they create medical costs. It is unfair that everyone in the society, including nonsmokers and people who follow a healthy diet, should contribute equally to covering these costs. Taxing people who engage in unhealthy behaviors creates extra income that can be used to cover the medical costs. In this way, some of the financial burden is shifted from all of society to just those who choose to participate in the unhealthy activities.
Finally, the high rate of taxation on cigarettes significantly increases revenue for the government. In addition to using this tax revenue on medical assistance, governments often use the revenue for other projects that benefit public welfare, such as building stadiums or creating public parks. Even basic government-supported services like public education benefit from these taxes. Thus, the taxes on cigarettes, and the proposed taxes on unhealthy foods, benefit everyone.
In the passage, the author mentions that many countries require cigarette smokers to pay high taxes on their purchase of cigarettes and the same taxes should be considered for unhealthy food and brings out three benefits of this action. However, the professor contends that each of the benefits could be challenge.
At first, the passage holds the view that taxes can discourage people from involving in unhealthy behaviors, which can be helpful to reduce the purchasing of unhealthy foods. The professor, on the other hand, believes that the high rate of taxes on cigaretts have led smokers to buy cheaper cigarettes with lower quality, which can cause more seriouse health problems. Accordingly, people who consume junk foods may continue buying them even if they are expensive and as a result, they would have less money to spend on healthy food.
Additionally, the writer mentions claims that taxes on unhealthy products are financially fair, since some of financial burden is shifted from the people who are not engaged in unhealthy activities. Nevertheless, the professor states that it still could be unfair, because low earning smokers and high earning smokers should pay similar taxes and smokers with low income have to pay higher taxes relative to their earnings. The same logic can be applied to food. Consequently, there would be a greater burden for low-income individuals who consum unhealthy food.
Finally, the author suggests that the high rate of taxation on cigarettes and unhealthy foods significantly increases revenue for the government, which can be used for other projects that benefit public wellfare. On the contrary, the lecturer points out that this taxes represent millions of dollars to the government and eventually they would be dependant on this money and don't want to lose it. Consequently, they won't be forcefull enough to illuminate unhealthy habits. For example, they don't contribute to advertisements against unhealthy foods and bannering in all areas since it would reduce their income.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 348, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
...government and eventually they would be dependant on this money and dont want to lose it....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 376, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ey would be dependant on this money and dont want to lose it. Consequently, they won...
^^^^
Line 13, column 492, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ate unhealthy habits. For example, they dont contribute to advertisements against un...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, well, for example, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32198142415 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72194508352 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.197517063 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.230769231 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8461538462 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0769230769 7.06452816374 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411926425487 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142357588606 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121685343522 0.0662205650399 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280051483469 0.162205337803 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799729061488 0.0443174109184 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.