TPO52
In the passage, the author mentions that an asteroid, instead of moon and mars, would be best option for colonizing and brings up three reasons to support it. However, the professor contends that the reasons are not practical and each of them has a downside.
At first, the passage holds the view that asteroids have lower gravity, which making the landing safer than landing on moon and mars and also it would be easier for space craft to take off again. The professor, on the other hand, believes that the low gravity presents some risks. Consequently, people will lose muscle mass and will have lower bone density. Astronauts who spend months in the space suffer from this diseases, as well.
Additionally, the writer mentions that some asteroids are reach in valuable elements and metals, such as gold and platinum, which are rare on the Earth. Therefore the colonists or businesses sponsering them could more than pay for cost of their support by mining minerals and sending them back to Earth. Nevertheless, the lecturer states that this is not a whole picture and there are additonal cost for colonies and transporting them. Moreover, the price of these items wouldn't remain the same, since mining in large quantity would increase the supply and consequently the prices will fall.
Finally, the author suggests that some of asteroids are very easy to reach, since they periodically come withing or near Earth's orbit and some of them actually get closer to Earth than our Moon. On the contrary, the professor points out that it is not always easy return from asteroids. This due to the fact that orbits are unusuall, they may be close at first but then move away from the Earth. In fact, they are close in one point, but they don't stay there and may even go farther than Mars. As a result, it would be challenging for spacecrafts to return to Earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'be the best'.
Suggestion: be the best
...teroid, instead of moon and mars, would be best option for colonizing and brings up thr...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...o spend months in the space suffer from this diseases, as well. Additionally, t...
^^^^
Line 9, column 154, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... platinum, which are rare on the Earth. Therefore the colonists or businesses sponsering ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 472, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...hem. Moreover, the price of these items wouldnt remain the same, since mining in large ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 35, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the asteroids') or simply say ''some asteroids''.
Suggestion: some of the asteroids; some asteroids
... Finally, the author suggests that some of asteroids are very easy to reach, since they peri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 444, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
..., they are close in one point, but they dont stay there and may even go farther than...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, in fact, such as, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 7.30242825607 246% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 321.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82866043614 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40093358912 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582554517134 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9436469092 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0666666667 7.06452816374 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.