While the text explains and gives reasons that sending people to live in an asteroid would be the best colonization ever, the lecturer highly disagrees and also gives his opinion to make known that there are reasons to not accept this topic.
First, the text argues that thanks to the low gravity, the landing can have less risks, in other words, can be safer. At the same time, it states that they can bring more equipment with less effort. However, when these explanations may sound very tempting, the lecturer points out that to have a low gravity has its positive things but is not healthy at all. He explains that this context damages the bones and even can produce a loss of muscle density.
Second, the reading claims that valuable metals found there can be taken from the asteroid and sent back to Earth. In this case, the speaker says that this argument is not the whole picture. Transporting metals from the space will increase the initial profit. On the other hand, if the supply prices grow, the lower will be the market prices, and obviously won't be profitable.
Third, the author says, asteroids are more easy to reach and therefore are a better choice. Moreover, the speaker claims this is not a hundred percent true, it is not easy to return from. Some of the asteroids don't have a unique place to stay. They don't stay close to Earth all the time, they use to move. There are cases when the asteroid can be further away, so the returning won't be something easy but what he affirms is that it will be a whole challenge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun risks is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...o the low gravity, the landing can have less risks, in other words, can be safer. At...
^^^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...nt true, it is not easy to return from. Some of the asteroids dont have a unique place to s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 211, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...y to return from. Some of the asteroids dont have a unique place to stay. They dont ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... dont have a unique place to stay. They dont stay close to Earth all the time, they ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 294, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... stay close to Earth all the time, they use to move. There are cases when the aster...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, while, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59420289855 5.08290768461 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17553079903 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572463768116 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4713662353 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5714285714 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268514737354 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837899789041 0.0996497079465 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652862784297 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157228264939 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542095674472 0.0443174109184 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.2367328918 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.