The reading and the lecturer introduce the topic about a weird sound, called the quakers, which Russian submarine sailors started hearing in the 1960s and 1980s. The text brings 3 possible theories about what could have caused that strange sound. In the listening passage, however, the lecturer disagrees with each theory and explains her opinion with base.
First, the author begins his first theory by saying these sounds must have been noises of orca whales as a result of a courtship ritual. These marine animals are known for this kind of noise because the females use them to call the attention of the males. The speaker states this theory could have been possible at first since the information about the noise is true, but it's contradictory at the same time. The orca whales live or spend most of the time near the surface of the ocean, a place where the submarines are not present for obvious reasons.
Secondly, the text also explains these noises might have been emitted by giant squid. Animals whose bodies don't count with skeletons. Specialists have done studies about this species and have the conclusion that thanks to its brain, it's a big possibility they could have emitted these sounds. The speaker claims there are flaws in this information, since the sounds were listened to in the 1960s and then in the 1980s, a 20 years gap between those years. Giant squids were always there, and there's no reason why these animals could have disappeared for that period of time.
The last theory in the reading shows the possibility there were other submarines from other countries who were working in silence and must have emitted those strange sounds. Furthermore, the speaker argues it couldn't have been possible since submarines do emit sounds, even today, the submarines are not that fast and silent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ed by giant squid. Animals whose bodies dont count with skeletons. Specialists have ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...he conclusion that thanks to its brain, its a big possibility they could have emitt...
^^^
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...rs. Giant squids were always there, and theres no reason why these animals could have ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...animals could have disappeared for that period of time. The last theory in the reading show...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...nds. Furthermore, the speaker argues it couldnt have been possible since submarines do ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, then, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 306.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96078431373 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26495815777 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1718811622 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.428571429 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111463135529 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423936593528 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477479515696 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0779993079077 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514861757275 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.