tpo 54 salinity
Recently some controversy has been generated about how people can reduce the salt of lakes' water which called salinity, so they would save animals' lives. The reading states three possible ways that people could use to reduce the salinity of the lakes. However, the professor states that none of the possible ways that the author mensiones are practicle to use.
The first point of dispute is if removing of the salt in deslination facilities is a practical method. The lecturer explains that the direct extraction of salt is not a good way to remove the salt since it leaves some soild materials behind. These materials such as selinum can reach the air and people breath it in. Thus, that might lead to serious health issues. By contrast, the writer is simply content to accept the theory of the direct remaval of salt would reduce the lake's salt effectively.
The second controversial issue is about if pouring water form ocean could help to reduce the lakes' salt. According to the professor, wherase it is true that adding ocean's water to the salty lakes will dilute the salt of the lakes, this process is costly. This is because it need pipe lines and canlas that constructed for really long distance, and government does not have enough amount of monay to do that. Interestinally, the author dose not seem bothered about the price of this method.
The final point of debate is the question of if buliding walls would be effective to decrease the lake's water salinity. The speaker says that this way is not actually durable becasue these wall probably will not last for a really long time. Some geological desaster could affect it negatively such as an earthquick. If that happened, the walls would be destroyed and the water of high salinity section would mix with low salinity water. Suprisingly, despite all these potential rationale, the author ignores all these possible explanations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, really, second, so, thus, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 321.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92834890966 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48433334146 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551401869159 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1558276119 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.0588235294 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42182429601 0.272083759551 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117472784061 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129050211537 0.0662205650399 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235694288918 0.162205337803 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602549184726 0.0443174109184 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.