tpo 60 Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories mentioned in the reading passage
In this set of materials, both the reading and the lecturer discuss the illegal hunting of rhinoceroses for selling their horns; as a result, the rhinoceroses become extinct. Although the passage provides three theories for preventing the illegally hunting of rhinoceroses, the speaker refutes all of the arguments described in this report.
To start off, the passage points out that if the horns of rhinoceros are removed, this animal would not attract the poachers; hence, they may not hunt them. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that this is not a practical solution because people must find all of them and remove their horns. She adds that if their horns are removed, the rhinoceroses will face many problems. They use the horns for many purposes such as digging holes for finding water, breaking the branch of trees for finding food, and protecting their children and tetrapods. So, without horns, their life becomes arduous for them.
Going through the next approach, the reading passage states that the public believes the horns have health benefits, but this belief has no scientific foundation, so it can be changed. The professor argues that these ideas have a strong cultural background, and people believe that the horns have a strong healing power derived from their ancestors. Therefore, these beliefs are strong and old; hence, the new science foundation cannot change these ideas.
Finally, the passage says that the government can sell all the horns taken from poachers at low prices; therefore, rhino poaching may not be profitable. The speaker disagrees by mentioning that most people would not buy the horns if they are illegal. However, when the government start to sell the horns, these people will buy them. She explains that the demand might grow dramatically, and creates a much larger market for the horns. Also, scientists believe that the larger demand would increase the price of the horns, so the poaching is enhanced, and it becomes more attractive for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ng of rhinoceroses, the speaker refutes all of the arguments described in this report. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, in contrast, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 328.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16768292683 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50387675323 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539634146341 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7176702909 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.