tpo 65
The reading passage tells us about some concerns of tunan farming, and gives three reasons to support the claim. On the other hand, the professor in the lecture reponds by saying that there are some promising solutions to solve all the questions proposed in the reading passage.
First, the professor disputes the reading that tuna farming will lead to more serious overfishing toward the young fish, casusing reduction of the wild tuna. Instead, He cites that to solve the problem of female tuna is disalbe to lay eggs in captivity, the scientists have invented a kind of biologically chemical that can envoket them to lay eggs. Owing to the new invention, tuna farmer will not have to catch the young tuna in the ocean to supply the amount of tuna.
Second, about the cost of breeding tuna, the professor concurs with the high requirement of protein to raise tuna, but he thinks it is not essential to use the expensive fish as main food. Rather, he points out that some kinds of plante are also equipped with high protein and the other nuterient that tuna need. Hence, changing to feed the tuna by the plant, the cost of breeding can significiantly decrease.
Lastly, even though tuna are prone to infection because of the parasites, the professor believes we can solve the problem by scientific results. In fact, there have already been some researches that the potential cause of the problem and proposes some possible solutions. Therefore, sooner or later, the problem of the parasite can be handled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
... envoket them to lay eggs. Owing to the new invention, tuna farmer will not have to catch the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, lastly, second, so, therefore, in fact, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89883268482 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47192903686 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56420233463 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6755350577 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.454545455 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453889730593 0.272083759551 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173554880175 0.0996497079465 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139427569231 0.0662205650399 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246418157872 0.162205337803 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.184930388155 0.0443174109184 417% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.