TPO INTEGRATED 16
There has been many debate among archeology of science whether the uncovering and studying of old artifact are faced with serious problems or not. The lecture says that the process of dedicating old artifacts is not faced by any problems. However, the reading argues that there are many problems faced the archaeologists while they are discovering the artifacts.
The first point of dispute is if any valuable artifact lost during the construction. The lecture claims that if the construction site is the site of interest, the building company and the government work together to protect nay artifacts. Either by building around them or excavating them. On contrary, the reading states that due to the increase in the population in Britain they are digging to build homes and uncovered valuable artifacts. Many precious artifact destroyed.
Another controversial issue is if the financial support for the archeological research is adequate or not. The lecture claims that the construction company is responsible for all the expenses. the funding from construction companies allowed the researchers to study far beyond than they could in the past. But the reading contradict this point saying that the researcher are funded through the government. there is not enough money provided, thus researcher only focus on important project.
The final point of dispute is if the archeologist can find job easily or not. The professor says that there are a lot of paid work in the archeological career. For example, examine the site, do the preservation and do the research. Yet, the reading disagrees, saying that archeological work only found in universities and some government agencies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun debate seems to be countable; consider using: 'many debates'.
Suggestion: many debates
There has been many debate among archeology of science whether the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rchaeologists while they are discovering the artifacts. The first point of di...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e they are discovering the artifacts. The first point of dispute is if any va...
^^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts. The first point of dispute is if any valuable artifact lost during the co...
^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uction site is the site of interest, the building company and the government work...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts. Many precious artifact destroyed. Another controversial issue is if the fi...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r the archeological research is adequate or not. The lecture claims that the cons...
^^
Line 6, column 195, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ny is responsible for all the expenses. the funding from construction companies all...
^^^
Line 6, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eading contradict this point saying that the researcher are funded through the go...
^^
Line 6, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rcher are funded through the government. there is not enough money provided, thus...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cher only focus on important project. The final point of dispute is if the arc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...b easily or not. The professor says that there are a lot of paid work in the arch...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.336996337 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99267175093 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3358932783 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0625 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3125 7.06452816374 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 4.19205298013 286% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251382890271 0.272083759551 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811274078222 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492447239122 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144351649995 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316143370514 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.