TPO INTEGRATED 22
Recently some controversy has been generated a bout whether to replace ethanol with gasoline or not. The lecture claims that replacing ethanol with gasoline is a challenging idea. However, the reading states that if ethanol replaced by gasoline, that will create many problems.
The first point of dispute is if ethanol will solve the problem of the global warming or not. The lecture contents that ethanol is produced from corn plants. Plants take carbon dioxide from atmosphere and give oxygen. According to the professor, ethanol will reduce the amount carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. However. The reading opposes this point saying that ethanol will not help the problem of global warming. Ethanol increase the a mount of carbon dioxide and thus trap heat into the atmosphere.
Another controversial issue is if the production of ethanol will reduce the amount of plant for other uses. The professor says that ethanol could be produced from cellulose. It is a king of plant not eaten by animals. However, the reading argues that production of ethanol from corn will decrease the amount of animals feed on corn.
The final point of dispute is of ethanol will compete with gasoline price or not. The lecture says that if ethanol production will increase, the prices of ethanol will decrease. According to the professor, a study shows that if the ethanol production increase three times as it is now, the prices of ethanol will decrease by 40 percent. on the other hand the author of the passage opposes this point by saying that ethanol are cheap now because the ethanol producers are getting support from the United States government. But, If the government stop supporting the producer, the ethanol prices will increase.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently some controversy has been generated a bout whether to rep...
^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nol will solve the problem of the global warming or not. The lecture contents tha...
^^
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e contents that ethanol is produced from corn plants. Plants take carbon dioxide ...
^^
Line 4, column 314, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...mount carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. However. The reading opposes this point saying ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 427, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'increases'.
Suggestion: increases
... the problem of global warming. Ethanol increase the a mount of carbon dioxide and thus ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 436, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...lem of global warming. Ethanol increase the a mount of carbon dioxide and thus trap h...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ethanol will reduce the amount of plant for other uses. The professor says that ...
^^^
Line 11, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ices of ethanol will decrease. According to the professor, a study shows that if ...
^^
Line 11, column 339, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...of ethanol will decrease by 40 percent. on the other hand the author of the passag...
^^
Line 11, column 401, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...author of the passage opposes this point by saying that ethanol are cheap now bec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11578947368 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48391811144 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456140350877 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7518258845 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 7.06452816374 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.463289318799 0.272083759551 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178849730051 0.0996497079465 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571370665143 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311367798292 0.162205337803 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350883464554 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.