tpo integrated 33
The lecture and the reading both discuss the carved stones balls. The reading states that there are many theories about the use and the mean of the carved stone balls and enumerates three theories. The lecture refutes this point by stating that all the theories mentioned in the reading are not convincing.
First of all, the reading argues that the carved stones balls were weapons used for hunting or fighting. However, the lecture disagrees. It claims that the weapon used during the Neolithic period should show sign of wears. The weapon should be cracked or had ripped pieces. However, according to the professor, the surface of the stone balls were well preserved and showing no damage.
In addition, the reading states that carved stones ball were used as primitive system for weight and measurement. All the stone balls were uniform in size. The lecture counters this point by stating that the stone balls were uniform in size but their masses were considerable different. Furthermore the stone balls were made of different kinds of stones such as sand stone and each type has different density. The stone balls not used as a primitive way for measurement.
Lastly, the reading makes the argument that the stones balls served a social purpose because the stones had elaborate designs. The lecture refutes this point by saying that it is unlikely that the stone balls served any social purpose. First some stones had very simple design. Moreover, the Neolithic people usually buried with their valued possessions with them, but non of those stones were found in the curved. That means that the stones had no social purpose and they were only for person use.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ne balls and enumerates three theories. The lecture refutes this point by stating t...
^^^
Line 6, column 140, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: uniform
...d measurement. All the stone balls were uniform in size. The lecture counters this point by st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 227, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: uniform
...nt by stating that the stone balls were uniform in size but their masses were considerable diff...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 289, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...eir masses were considerable different. Furthermore the stone balls were made of different ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver, the Neolithic people usually buried with their valued possessions with them,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, well, in addition, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03584229391 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24605099168 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476702508961 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1811170887 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0555555556 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478973058755 0.272083759551 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185535684009 0.0996497079465 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106188586821 0.0662205650399 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311369994431 0.162205337803 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808894940642 0.0443174109184 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.