TPO INTEGRATED 33
Recently some controversy has been generated about whether the lines surrounded the skeletal bones of the sykocypotros are feathers or not. The lectures contends that the lines are feathers. On the other hand, the reading refutes saying that the lines are not feathers.
The lecture claims that all the other animal decomposition were well preserved. The fact that the synoprys feather were well preserved as well. However the reading states that the skins decomposed into skin fibers, then preserved into lines.
The lecturer says that the chemicals of the frills are totally different from that of the feather the feather contain beta carotene however the frills not. The fact that the synopricts fossils contain the same beta carotene confirm that the lines are feathers not frills. However the reading argues that parts of dinosaur anatomy were the frills rather than the feathers.
the lecture contents that the colorful feather of the syropex were used to attract male during mate. The fact that they feathers were orange and white proof that they were used for that purpose. But, the reading refutes saying that the feathers were useless. The usual use of the feather were flight and thermoregulation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'contend'.
Suggestion: contend
...otros are feathers or not. The lectures contends that the lines are feathers. On the oth...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ying that the lines are not feathers. The lecture claims that all the other an...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ys feather were well preserved as well. However the reading states that the skins decom...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in fibers, then preserved into lines. The lecturer says that the chemicals of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'the feather'.
Suggestion: the feather
...ills are totally different from that of the feather the feather contain beta carotene however the frill...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 273, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...that the lines are feathers not frills. However the reading argues that parts of dinos...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nes are feathers not frills. However the reading argues that parts of dinosaur an...
^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the frills rather than the feathers. the lecture contents that the colorful f...
^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 122, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'feather'
Suggestion: feather
...ct male during mate. The fact that they feathers were orange and white proof that they w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eather were flight and thermoregulation.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 30.3222958057 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 204.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1862745098 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46250232974 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 145.348785872 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485294117647 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7631769237 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3846153846 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6923076923 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 7.06452816374 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0940098976818 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408302884152 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430415976179 0.0662205650399 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0575203291773 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419001864191 0.0443174109184 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.