TPO INTEGRATED 42
There has been some debates among whether there are ways to prevent birds from getting injured by glass while they are flying. The lecture says that there are no way to prevent the birds form getting injured. However, the reading refutes, it claims that there are three possible solutions to prevent the birds from getting injured.
The first point of dispute is if the one way glass will prevent the birds from any injures. The lecturer says that the one way glass reflects as mirrors and birds did not understand mirrors, when they see the reflection of the sky or the trees in the glass they think that it is true and they fly through the glass. However, the reading refutes this point by saying that one way glass will protect the birds from injuries because it is transparent from only one direction, so birds will think it is a solid barrier.
Another controversial issue is if colorful designs will protect birds from injuries. The lecture contents that the birds will not understand the small openings in the strips designs and they will think they are small holes and fly through them. Also, if we remove the opening from the designs the rooms will be too dark. But, the author of the reading opposes this point saying that the designs with small opening will prevent the birds from getting injured. Also the opening allow the light to pass on to the rooms .
The final point of dispute is if the magnetic field will prevent the birds from getting injured.
The lecture asserts that birds only use magnetic field while they are migrating for a long distance. However, for short distances bird use their eye and the bright light to navigate. Yet, the passage disagrees. it claims that the magnetic field on the building will prevent birds from getting injured while they are flying and help them to navigate in the right directions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...event the birds from getting injured. The first point of dispute is if the one...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lass they think that it is true and they fly through the glass. However, the read...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rds will think it is a solid barrier. Another controversial issue is if colorf...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the birds will not understand the small openings in the strips designs and they...
^^
Line 6, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will not understand the small openings in the strips designs and they will thin...
^^
Line 6, column 465, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...prevent the birds from getting injured. Also the opening allow the light to pass on...
^^^^
Line 6, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... getting injured. Also the opening allow the light to pass on to the rooms . ...
^^
Line 6, column 522, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...allow the light to pass on to the rooms . The final point of disput...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w the light to pass on to the rooms . The final point of dispute is if the mag...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 211, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...o navigate. Yet, the passage disagrees. it claims that the magnetic field on the b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 331.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75528700906 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1654929806 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.429003021148 0.540411800872 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8107355396 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.375 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 7.06452816374 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444979069977 0.272083759551 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164209784536 0.0996497079465 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082496151846 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256747256108 0.162205337803 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859909541813 0.0443174109184 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 53.8541721854 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.42419426049 81% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.