TPO INTEGRATED 44
There has been some debate among whether the coins that have been discovered are genuine or not. The lecture claims that the coins are true and are considered to be historical pieces. However the reading refutes that the coins are fake and placed by someone to mislead the public.
The first point of dispute is the far distance between the North settlement and the native American site. The lecturer says that native American people were interested in collecting objects from far away, thus they brought the coins from the Norse. However the author of the reading refutes this point saying that it is impossible to go to the Norse because the far distance.
Another controversial issue is that there were no other coins found at the settlement site. The lecture contends that the Norse did not create permeant settlement at north America, on there way back to Europe they took all the coins with them. On the other hand, The passage opposes this point stating that the Norse did not bring any coins with then to north American.
The final point of dispute is that the American are less interested in the coins. The professor claims that the Norse found the coins attractive to American people. They could use them as necklaces and jewelries, so they started to trade the coin with them. But, the reading argues that the American did not recognize the silver coins as money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There has been some debate among whethe...
^^
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There has been some debate among whether the coins that have been discove...
^^
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...are considered to be historical pieces. However the reading refutes that the coins are ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ced by someone to mislead the public. The first point of dispute is the far di...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... they brought the coins from the Norse. However the author of the reading refutes this...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ht the coins from the Norse. However the author of the reading refutes this point...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o the Norse because the far distance. Another controversial issue is that ther...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny coins with then to north American. The final point of dispute is that the ...
^^^
Line 8, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...merican. The final point of dispute is that the American are less interested...
^^
Line 8, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the coins. The professor claims that the Norse found the coins attractive to Amer...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, so, then, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79508196721 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25445600739 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504098360656 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.8521118636 49.2860985944 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.0 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7692307692 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15384615385 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.549671118687 0.272083759551 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194604288063 0.0996497079465 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078407181525 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325604831631 0.162205337803 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650143790742 0.0443174109184 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.