TPO INTEGRATED 44
There has been some debates among whether the coins that have been discovered are genuine or not. The lecture claims that the coins are historical pieces. However, the reading refutes that by stating that the coins are fake and placed by someone to mislead the public.
The first point of dispute is the far distance between the Norse settlement and the native American site. The lecturer says that native Americans people were interested in collecting objects from far away places, thus they might bring the coins from the Norse settlement site. However, the author of the reading refutes this point by saying that it is impossible for the americans to go to the Norse settelement because the far distance between the two places.
Another controversial issue is that there were no other coins found at the settlement site. The lecture contends that the Norse did not create permeant settlement at north America, on there way back to Europe they took all the coins with them. On the other hand, The passage opposes this point stating that the Norse did not bring any coins with them to north America.
The final point of dispute is that the American are less interested in the coins. The professor claims that the Norse found the coins attractive to the Americans people. Americans could use them as necklaces and jewelries, so the Norse started to trade the coin with them. But, the reading argues that the Americans did not recognize the silver coins as money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There has been some debates among whether the coins that have been discove...
^^
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver, the reading refutes that by stating that the coins are fake and placed by so...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ced by someone to mislead the public. The first point of dispute is the far di...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the Norse settlement site. However, the author of the reading refutes this point...
^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that it is impossible for the americans to go to the Norse settelement because ...
^^
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mericans to go to the Norse settelement because the far distance between the two...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e far distance between the two places. Another controversial issue is that ther...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...any coins with them to north America. The final point of dispute is that the ...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erica. The final point of dispute is that the American are less interested...
^^
Line 8, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the coins. The professor claims that the Norse found the coins attractive to the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, so, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87843137255 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30458813887 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482352941176 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8832371876 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6923076923 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 7.06452816374 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.56189155834 0.272083759551 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.211977957354 0.0996497079465 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072008020663 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.337059717758 0.162205337803 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051676168321 0.0443174109184 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.