TPO05
the great houses were used for three main reasons
people lived in them
they stored foods in them
they were used as ceremonial centers
The reading states that great structures in Chaco Canyon were used for three main reasons. Nevertheless, the professor overthrows all of these explanations with other three mutually exclusive rationalizations. In the following, the rationale behind these three explanations will be elaborated.
First of all, the article recognizes that these buildings were used completely for residental means. In spite of the fact that this idea is convincing from "outside" perspective of these houses, the lecturer refutes it because he says that "inside" of these buildings cast doubt on the idea of living citizens. He claims that if people were staying in them, there would have been enough fire places owing to cooking meals, but fire places, even in big houses, were sufficient only for 10 families even though they were huge enough for more than 100 people to live in.
Secondly, the passage posits that these living places were used as grain storages. nonetheless, the teacher disagrees with this assumption insomuch as he sheds light on the findings of some excavations. He refers to them and concurs with the view that no reasons have been found supporting the ida of containing foods in these places. Moreover, researchers have not found any remaining of nutrients there.
Third, the reading accepts that these places were used by inhabitants as ritual gathering centers. Notwithstanding, the professor disagrees with this justification inasmuch as he upholds that these centers were only used as trash places for construction tasks. Additionally, the old pots were merely regular trashs which workers used to throw away their wastes in them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 84, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nonetheless
...ing places were used as grain storages. nonetheless, the teacher disagrees with this assump...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to them and concurs with the view that no reasons have been found supporting th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, third, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44615384615 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04015532148 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611538461538 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6872766268 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.923076923 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237115185652 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880170369834 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654529730243 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144472987189 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192648174803 0.0443174109184 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.