tuna farming concerns
The passage presents some concerns regarding the inefficiency of tuna farming in ocean cages. The lecturer, however, disproves the claim that they are valid points, and he mentions practical solutions that have been proposed to resolve each of these issues. His further demonstrations are follows.
Firstly, while it is true that currently Tuna farming relies on catching young wild tuna and growing them until they are ready to be sold, new research shows that in near future this limitation can be resolved. Scientists have realized that by injecting the female tuna with hormones, the fish would lay eggs readily. Additionaly the injection has been proven to not be detrimental for the Tuna or its future consumer. Thus, this approach prevents the further decrease in the wild tuna population.
Secondly, although today the nutrition source of tuna farms mainly consists of high-protein fish-based food, which is significantly costly, the required protein in the diet of the tuna can be obtained from plants. By utilizing protein that is present in plants, the nutritional needs of tuna would be fulfilled in an inexpensive way. Therefore, tuna farms can be presumably profitable.
Finally, the reports from the tuna farms off the coast of southern Australia indeed show a parasite infestation. Nevertheless, scientists have suggested possible ways to overcome this challenge in the area. For instance, in the case of blood flukes, it is speculated that moving the tuna farms farther into the ocean causes a considerable decline in the number of blood flukes, since the materials they need to thrive are present in water adjacent to the shore. Hence, there are applicable scientific means to avoid parasite infestation in tuna farms.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 312, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an inexpensive way" with adverb for "inexpensive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...tional needs of tuna would be fulfilled in an inexpensive way. Therefore, tuna farms can be presumabl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31046931408 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79974547487 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610108303249 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2988663876 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.071428571 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41801769944 0.272083759551 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139238006249 0.0996497079465 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113869551751 0.0662205650399 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234343919611 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158474730506 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.