Wild tuna a species of large ocean fish have decreased in number because of overfishing Recently attempts have been made to farm tuna by feeding the fish in ocean cages until they become large enough for sale However tuna farming has faced several problem

Both the reading and the lecture talk about tuna farming in ocean cages. the passage gives three points regarding problems of the tuna beng farmed. However, the lecturer thinks the other way. He mentions that there are promising solutions for this issue as following.

First of all, both the text and the professor point out capturing myriads of young tuna fishes from the wild to farm them and because female ones do not lay egg when captured, farmers have to take more young tuna fshes leading to decrease in the population of the wild tunas. On the other hand, the professor gives information that this will not take so long. Accordingly, scientists have found certian injection hormone which help the female tuna to lay eggs under circumstances of captivated farming. Hence, in this way the first problem is solved without harming the tunas population.

Second of all, both the author and the listening cite the cost of feeding tuna fishes captured. The passage asserts it is more costly because a single tuna eats 70 kilograms of fish every day making it expensive for farmers. Nevertheless, the listening names plants having high protein and nutrients to use for these tunas. As a result, the second issue can be eliminated.

Third, both the writer and the lecturer put forth tunas become infested with parasites. The text explains that parasite infestations weak the tunas and make their growth slow. The author rejects the idea in south Australia due to the deacrese of blood flow in deep waters. According to the professor, the parasites can no survive under such conditions. Therefore, the last criticism with regard to tuna farming in captivated form is refuted.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...talk about tuna farming in ocean cages. the passage gives three points regarding pr...
^^^
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...s the other way. He mentions that there are promising solutions for this issue as following. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 571, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tunas'' or 'tuna's'?
Suggestion: tunas'; tuna's
...t problem is solved without harming the tunas population. Second of all, both th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d without harming the tunas population. Second of all, both the author and the l...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rmers. Nevertheless, the listening names plants having high protein and nutrients...
^^
Line 7, column 7, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...econd issue can be eliminated. Third, both the writer and the lecturer put for...
^^
Line 7, column 444, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... farming in captivated form is refuted.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, hence, however, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, therefore, third, as a result, first of all, with regard to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01785714286 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49335596728 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614285714286 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.0482811875 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6470588235 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4705882353 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299218891837 0.272083759551 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815141522019 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068386445188 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170228382119 0.162205337803 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332238160668 0.0443174109184 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.