TPO11

The article states that declinig in reading the literature and novels among people especially the youngs is harmful for the culture and provides three reasons of supports. however, the lecture explains doubted this idea and refutes each of the author's reasons.

first, the reading states that by decline in reading the literature the public missing out an important benefit. The professor refutes this point by stating that literature is not the only source for of intellectual content. she explains that there variety of fields and books which stimulate the culture benefits such as science or histoty. she asserts, other majors are as creative as the literature.

Second,The article claims that, whatching movies and listening to the musice is not an appropriate alternative for reading a book. The article believes that this habit of whatching the tv anstead of reading would lower the level of culture. however, the professor contends that in general listening to a brilliant track of the music is maybe more intellectual habit that reading the novel. she says even watching a good movie could be more beneficial. The professor alleged that the culture has changed and does not depends on the books anymore.

Third, the reading averts that reading less literature is more regretable now because there are a lot of inteligent writers nowadays.The lecture oppose this point by saying that the readers should not be blamed for reading less. she says it's the writer faults that people do not read their books these days because the modern writing is completely difficult to understand.