TPO14
In the reading passage, the author claims that there are three viable explanations for the advantages of applying salvage logging, as a practice in which the dead trees are conveyed from the areas of forest affected by the fire. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in text and states that regardless of its seeming benefits as a method for recovering the forest, this approach costs prolonged environmental damages and even its economic benefits are not realistic.
At first, the author argues that falling the dead trees on the bottom of the forest left no space for growing the new plant according to this issue that it takes the considerable time that trees get decomposed through the natural process. Conversely, the lecture brings up the idea that this decomposition provides suitable condition for nourishing new vegetation by enriching the soil. Indeed, if the dead body remove from the forest, the absence of nutrients in the soil will hinder the next plant generation's growth.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that presence of some insects renders the healthy trees vulnerable. On the contrary, the professor disputes this idea by clarifying the fact that although this issue is true regarding the trees, these dead trees are accounted as a proper habitat for other species including birds and insects as well that play a crucial role in establishing long-term healthy forest. Consequently, salvage logging deteriorates the circumstance.
Finally, the author asserts that industries can take benefits of dead trees to augment their productivity and decline the unemployment rate. The professor, thought, dismisses this point by subscribing the point that particularly in the severe fire, only a small segment of trees are usable; hence, its economic benefits will not last for a long time. Moreover, the workforce is not only temporary, but also this process requires applying the helicopter and other vehicles that are capable of transferring heavy trees that are so expensive. Besides, it needs individuals who are expert and experienced in this field that should be undoubtedly outsourced. Therefore, they cannot use local workforce.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 1373.03311258 137% => OK
No of words: 353.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34277620397 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84581457765 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 145.348785872 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586402266289 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 419.366225166 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.5937168583 49.2860985944 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.076923077 110.228320801 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1538461538 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6923076923 7.06452816374 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351344784489 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110559890807 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678429654706 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20192584148 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340949205701 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 63.6247240618 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.