tpo22
While the reading passage states that, ethanol does not have to replace with gasolin, the professor in the lecture disagrees with the reading, and he further explains his opinion because of following reasons.
First, the reading passage claims that, if the use of ethanol increase, carbon dioxide will be increased, and global warmin. In contrast, the professor in the lecture rejects this point that made in the reading, and he says that, with procecc of growing corns to use ethanol, more carbon dioxide will removed from atmosphier by growing corns.
Second, the reading passage shows that, the production of ethanol causes the available of plants for uses other fuel will reduced. In one spot, the professor in the lecture talks that, it do not have to produc, and with grow corn, more animals can be feed.
Third, in the reading passagea author follows that, ethanol never be able to rival with gasoline on price because the tax of ethanol will over $11 billion. On the other hand, the professor in the lecture illustrates that, in the future ethanol will be able to competition with gasoline. In addition, the cost of ethanol will become cheaper than gasoline because with more produce, the cost will drop and go down. Besides, the drop of ethanol will become %40.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'remove'
Suggestion: remove
...o use ethanol, more carbon dioxide will removed from atmosphier by growing corns. Sec...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
...able of plants for uses other fuel will reduced. In one spot, the professor in the lect...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'does'?
Suggestion: does
...professor in the lecture talks that, it do not have to produc, and with grow corn,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, second, so, third, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93023255814 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29186724953 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9026791178 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.777777778 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348528465402 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173094337298 0.0996497079465 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589747776192 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224844581579 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519162262369 0.0443174109184 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.