TPO3
The facts addressed in the reading passage are true, but after thorough examination, researchers proofed that the attributed painting was indeed a work by Rembrandt.
First, the fur color in the painting was attached by someone else about a century after the painting was finished. The in the original painting, the fur color is consistent with the white linen cap. The luxurious fur was added probably for higher value of the painting, by making the painting seems as a formal portray of a noble.
Second, in the original painting, the woman is dressed in light color clothes, which illuminates her face. So the face should not be partially shadowed; instead, the face should be illuminated just as how it appears now.
Third, the wood panel used when refining this painting is to make the portray more grand and thus increase is value. `In fact, researchers found out that the wooden penal on which original painting was painted was from the same tree with the panel that Rembrandt made his self portray on.`
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 67, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... when refining this painting is to make the portray more grand and thus increase is value. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, third, thus, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 1373.03311258 63% => OK
No of words: 172.0 270.72406181 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02325581395 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51143948475 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622093023256 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 419.366225166 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2974833938 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 63.6247240618 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.