TPO32 integrated
The author of the passage illustrates three possible explains to the froglike underwater noises in Russian, while the lecturer in the lecture is opposite to all of them.
To begin with, the author claims that the strange noises were caused by orca whales. However, the lecturer retorts that it is unlikely to be the whales’ calls. Admittedly, there are considerably amount of orca whales living in the submarines patrolling areas, but they are also active in the surface of water. For that matter, sailors deep in the ocean should not hear the sound made by orca whales in the surface. Besides, the sonar would detect some evidence of orca whale activities if those parts of ocean were their habitats.
Moreover, the author believes that giant squid produced the sounds. In the contrary, the lecturer refutes that there are several facts against it. The strange sounds were detected first in 1960, repeating for two decades, and then stopped in 1980. Yet the giant squid still lives today. Therefore, such a theory cannot explain why the squid did not continue to make the sounds. It is also irrational to suddenly start to cause the noises one day and stop to do so 20 years later.
Finally, the author puts forward that it might be starry sounds from another country’s submarines that were captured by the Russian. Instead, the author rebuts that this idea does not hold up. The sounds can move around frequently and change direction quickly, which is impossible for a submarine. Also, during moving, submarines’ engine could generate noise that is loud enough to be detected by sonar. This kind of records, however, were never reported by the Russian submarines. In addition, with current technology, we cannot build a submarine that is so fast and quiet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...lls. Admittedly, there are considerably amount of orca whales living in the submarines...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, while, in addition, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03040540541 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55408756949 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608108108108 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.960797594 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7222222222 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.27373068433 304% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389325643428 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100017777512 0.0996497079465 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588289661503 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19668581782 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926319013628 0.0443174109184 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.