tpo34
Both author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the accuracy of sea cow's extinction hypotheses. While the reading part lists three assumptions as the possible causes of this incident, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues that the main reason for this phenomenon is unknown.
To begin with, the article mentions to the overhunting by the native Siberian people as the feasible assumption of this event. However, the instructor challenges the validity of this fact by mentioning to the size of the sea cow. He states that the sea cow approximately weighs ten tons and its height is nine meters, which could feed the whole inhabitants of Siberian for one month. Besides, the population of this region was not that dense to hunt the entire sea cows as the food resource.
Next, the passage assumes that by the ecosystems disturbances, the population of kelp, on which the sea cow depends, had decreased. On the contrary, the professor refutes this presumption. He asserts that, in a case which the ecosystem disturbances were so severe, the total marine animals such as the whale should be declined. But there is no any report about this issue. As a result, the disturbances were not that much severe to lessen the kelp’s population.
Finally, the text posits that the European fur traders who came to the island could have led this incident. In the contrary, the lecturer casts doubt on the accuracy of this claim. Based on his assertion, the population of the sea cow had decreased long before the traders' arrival. Subsequently, another factor had caused this decrement before the European fur traders. Thus, it did not relate to traders' arrival and it is vague.
All in all, the reading and the listening passages both discuss the same topic, giving opposing arguments in favor of their point of view.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... whale should be declined. But there is no any report about this issue. As a resul...
^^
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'traders'' or 'trader's'?
Suggestion: traders'; trader's
...e sea cow had decreased long before the traders arrival. Subsequently, another factor h...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'finally', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'such as', 'as a result', 'on the contrary', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.28 0.261695866417 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.122857142857 0.158904122519 77% => OK
Adjectives: 0.06 0.0723426182421 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0314285714286 0.0435111971325 72% => OK
Pronouns: 0.02 0.0277247811725 72% => OK
Prepositions: 0.122857142857 0.128828473217 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0314285714286 0.0370669169778 85% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.66480831971 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.02 0.0208969081088 96% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.18 0.128158765124 140% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00857142857143 0.0158828679856 54% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0114285714286 0.0114777025283 100% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1859.0 1645.83664459 113% => OK
No of words: 309.0 271.125827815 114% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01618122977 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04852973271 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.352750809061 0.374372842146 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.255663430421 0.287516216867 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.200647249191 0.187439937562 107% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.119741100324 0.113142543107 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66480831971 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585760517799 0.539623497131 109% => OK
Word variations: 64.2834560585 53.8517498576 119% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.1764705882 21.7502111507 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5565383114 49.3711431718 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.352941176 132.220823453 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1764705882 21.7502111507 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.705882352941 0.878197800319 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 43.7428136303 50.5018328374 87% => OK
Elegance: 2.49180327869 1.90840788429 131% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.725178034497 0.549887131256 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.124721705613 0.142949733639 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0827239015507 0.0787303798458 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.638522081732 0.631733273073 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.191068051244 0.139662658121 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.341374093273 0.266732575781 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142718547044 0.103435571967 138% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.469777044074 0.414875509568 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.109341531562 0.0530846634433 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.506885905826 0.40443939384 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106091037355 0.0528353158467 201% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.26048565121 211% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 8.0 3.1766004415 252% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.