(NO RELATION WITH THE CONTEXT) The reading discusses Essential Air Service (EAS) is a US government program created by the United States Department of Transportation for people living in the rural area where commercial air service is not profitable and benefits of this air service to the local people. The lecturer's view on this matter contradicts the reading.
First of all, the reading states that EAS helps the local people to adopt air transportation and narrows the gap between poor and rich. But, the lecturer thinks that all those communities can be accessible via bus, car, etc. Moreover, he also thinks that it is a waste of time and does not impact the relationship between poor and rich.
Secondly, it will help the local communities tourism as it enable more easy transportation system. But, the professor of the lecture argues that all these focus should be on economic development and money should be spent on planning and construction of the development.
Finally, the reading states that as the air service has small aircraft, there will be less cost for operating and maintaining all these aircraft. But the lecturer argues that it takes a lot of money to maintaince all these aircraft.
Therefore, although there are many reasons presented in the reading as to why the ESA does something good, the lecture suggest otherwise. The professor pokes holes in every argument presented in the reading
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'communities'' or 'community's'?
Suggestion: communities'; community's
...h. Secondly, it will help the local communities tourism as it enable more easy transpor...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1187.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07264957265 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78502998073 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551282051282 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3304334554 49.2860985944 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.909090909 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.