tpo36
Both the author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the main reason which led the Mary Rose to sink. While the reading part lists three reasons as the possible causes of this incident, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into the question for the information in the reading passage.
First of all, the article posits that the half closed gunport led the seawater inside and caused this accident. However, the instructor casts doubt on the accuracy of this assumption. The professor states that this surmise could be valid if the gunport were fired. However, based on the study done on this warship, whole guns are loaded, and they were not fired before the ship sank. As a result, this claim cannot be responsible for this accident.
Next, the passage mentions to the weak relationship between the sailors and the captain of the ship, which the sailors disobeyed the captain's order in an emergency situation. On the contrast, the lecturer challenges the validity of this claim. The professor asserts that the English navy army was picked among the most professional and capable sailors since the Mary Rose had a crucial position in the England army. In this case, the feasibility of disobedience of the sailors is so rare, because they were the best in their fields.
Finally, meanwhile, the text based on the French officer's claim, assumes that the drowning happened for the sake of the immense damage caused by the French ships; the instructor, on the other hand, refutes this claim. Based on the professor's logic, the French officer claimed in this way to demonstrate its priority toward the English army. In fact, the declaration of wear caused by the French army just possesses the political aspect, which the French army is stronger and invulnerable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both the author and lecturer offer two o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... information in the reading passage. First of all, the article posits that th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot be responsible for this accident. Next, the passage mentions to the weak r...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they were the best in their fields. Finally, meanwhile, the text based on th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 237, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
... hand, refutes this claim. Based on the professors logic, the French officer claimed in th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 495, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ench army is stronger and invulnerable.
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'while', 'in fact', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.272189349112 0.261695866417 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.127218934911 0.158904122519 80% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0710059171598 0.0723426182421 98% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0295857988166 0.0435111971325 68% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0118343195266 0.0277247811725 43% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130177514793 0.128828473217 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0355029585799 0.0370669169778 96% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.46533797289 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0118343195266 0.0208969081088 57% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.201183431953 0.128158765124 157% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00591715976331 0.0158828679856 37% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00887573964497 0.0114777025283 77% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1837.0 1645.83664459 112% => OK
No of words: 302.0 271.125827815 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08278145695 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.35761589404 0.374372842146 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.26821192053 0.287516216867 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.168874172185 0.187439937562 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0894039735099 0.113142543107 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46533797289 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566225165563 0.539623497131 105% => OK
Word variations: 60.1431454793 53.8517498576 112% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.5714285714 21.7502111507 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.419313193 49.3711431718 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.214285714 132.220823453 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 21.7502111507 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 0.878197800319 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.39072847682 177% => OK
Readability: 48.3926206244 50.5018328374 96% => OK
Elegance: 2.59649122807 1.90840788429 136% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.149548698792 0.142949733639 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0752573165149 0.0787303798458 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.707385255697 0.631733273073 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.133567445681 0.139662658121 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.564718420054 0.414875509568 136% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0922246180588 0.0530846634433 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.