1. Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The author adduces that human beings should be responsible for the hazard species caused by their activities. This is the claim with which I completely do not concur. Among the countless rearing reasons, I will list the most conspicuous ones in the following paragraphs to verify my standpoint.
The most striking fact which should be considered is all human activities do not present the direct impact over the environment. In another word, each stir in the world possesses an insensible and indirect impact on the atmosphere, in which by consideration of the direct impact of mankind’s activities, those impacts will be overlooked. For instance, if the mankind solely considered the air pollution caused by the usage of fossil fuels and underestimate its impact on the global warming, they ignore the effect of heated air and its impact over the polar ice. In this scenario, this ignorance will cause to the increment of the sea levels and threaten of organisms which used to the dominant habitat.
Another equal crux fact which should be highlighted is the period required for the presentation of the side-effect caused by human activities. Indeed, the accumulation of small variations in the environment caused by human beings which in their implementation time seems unimportant fact and controllable by the ecosystem, over time gets a jeopardy role in the ecosystem. For instance, the discussed molten polar ice has not occurred over a night, it takes a prolonged duration to happen; therefore, since this period does not match with people life period, it is considered as an unimportant phenomenon. However, by the consideration of future life, it is a real hazard for the future generation.
Finally, the existence of cogent chain and interconnection between the organisms in the environment gives the importance to all species that are in danger independent of the men direct or indirect impact over them. This undeniable link is verified by the butterfly effect; according to this principle, the movement of a butterfly wing in the specific region can lead to the appearance of a storm in a far away space. Therefore, a minor variation in the ecosystem for the sake of mankind activities can end to butterfly effect on the land over the seas. In this position, the ignorance of side-effect of this stir can threaten the chain existed in the ecosystem and their organisms.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned facts explicitly depicts the crucial effect of human beings over the environment which should be controlled by themselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[14]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
Suggestion: side effect
...od required for the presentation of the side-effect caused by human activities. Indeed, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 698, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... real hazard for the future generation. Finally, the existence of cogent chain a...
^^^
Line 4, column 590, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[14]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
Suggestion: side effect
...eas. In this position, the ignorance of side-effect of this stir can threaten the chain exi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h should be controlled by themselves.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 28.8173652695 90% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 55.5748502994 119% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 16.3942115768 146% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2141.0 2260.96107784 95% => OK
No of words: 416.0 441.139720559 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14663461538 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03395383589 2.78398813304 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 204.123752495 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480769230769 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 705.55239521 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.22255489022 237% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3073474165 57.8364921388 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.8125 119.503703932 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 23.324526521 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.70786347227 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110558698547 0.218282227539 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435457654708 0.0743258471296 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455409915117 0.0701772020484 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0724727020669 0.128457276422 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339117643142 0.0628817314937 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.3799401198 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.32208582834 110% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 98.500998004 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.