tpo11.1
The author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the side-effects of less literature reading trends among the today's public. While, the reading passages lists some factors as the negative effects of this incident, the professor counters these specific factors and presents some clues to call into question for the information in the text.
First of all, the professor refutes the fact of missing intellectual stimulation, which in the reading part is nominated as one of the drawbacks. Since nothing can provide that proliferated background as the literature does. The professor states that the literature is not the sole source of intellectual enhancement. The other types of books such as the history, science, and art literature offer that benefits too. Besides, there is no any evidence to suggest that the people do not take advantages of these kinds of books instead of the literature writing.
Next, the passage mentions to the low-level of cultural value which is caused by the trivial entertainment facilities. The lecturer doubts the truth of this claim. As she asserts, there other types of entertainments prepared based on the demand of modern lifestyle. This equipment such as a track of song or a scene of movie is effective as much as the literature. Even in some cases, their influences are sharper than the literature writing.
Finally, the professor argues that the decrement of literature reading will lead to the decline of literature writing. Meanwhile, in the reading part presumes that in this era with the less interest to the literature, the publishers will not invest the money in this field and the talented writers will lose their financial adherence. Based on the lecturer's belief, the lack of advocacy by the publisher does not relate to the decline of readers. However, nowadays the contents of books are so complicated and vague which do not appeal to the readers' desires. Consequently, the main reason for this situation is the writers, not the readers.
That is how the professor effectively challenges the claim made in the article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...er that benefits too. Besides, there is no any evidence to suggest that the people...
^^
Line 7, column 349, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...their financial adherence. Based on the lecturers belief, the lack of advocacy by the pub...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'while', 'such as', 'first of all', 'in some cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.278820375335 0.261695866417 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.117962466488 0.158904122519 74% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0643431635389 0.0723426182421 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0509383378016 0.0435111971325 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00804289544236 0.0277247811725 29% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.144772117962 0.128828473217 112% => OK
Participles: 0.029490616622 0.0370669169778 80% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82554911666 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0187667560322 0.0208969081088 90% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.174262734584 0.128158765124 136% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0107238605898 0.0158828679856 68% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0107238605898 0.0114777025283 93% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2081.0 1645.83664459 126% => OK
No of words: 338.0 271.125827815 125% => OK
Chars per words: 6.15680473373 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.04852973271 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.360946745562 0.374372842146 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.307692307692 0.287516216867 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.239644970414 0.187439937562 128% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.139053254438 0.113142543107 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82554911666 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526627218935 0.539623497131 98% => OK
Word variations: 55.7375783471 53.8517498576 104% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0529801325 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.7777777778 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7323351706 49.3711431718 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.611111111 132.220823453 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.611111111111 0.878197800319 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 49.547008547 50.5018328374 98% => OK
Elegance: 2.56060606061 1.90840788429 134% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.68361163964 0.549887131256 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.137029865015 0.142949733639 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0536766575854 0.0787303798458 68% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.668768578754 0.631733273073 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.144886921802 0.139662658121 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.344118856449 0.266732575781 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863345330431 0.103435571967 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.534045580765 0.414875509568 129% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0464112232679 0.0530846634433 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.496852212378 0.40443939384 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115749919602 0.0528353158467 219% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.