tpo36-integ writing

Essay topics:

tpo36-integ writing

The reading and the listening are both about a method of transforming clouds to fall rain or snow instead of hail pellets. Whereas the penman of the text suggests that cloud seeding is a suitable way for the problem, the orator states that there is no clear evidence to support the convenient impacts of could seeding on the clouds. The lecturer cast doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing 3 theories.

First of all, the writer claims, experts could gain a suitable result from the experiments in the labratory. The speaker views the issue from an opposite angle. she says, while it is compeletly possible to have fine observations in the laboratory, there are enormous facts in the real world that can change the condition.

The second point offered by the author of is that there are evidences from other countries about the same issue where it could solve the problem. Conversely, the lecturer believes that the situation in the asia was different from the present condition. Consequently, she adds that asian countries used this method in the urban areas which was full of pollution. Moreover, she mentions that, we can not make a decision about the farm-lands in the United states by focusing on results of clound seeding in another weather condition.

Finally, the reading passage states that, local studies shows us a reduction in hail damage by using the same method. On the other hand, the professor thinks that there are initial differences among the weather of the places that we studied recently. Thus, she feels that other factors also affected on that decreasemen.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'seed'
Suggestion: seed
...support the convenient impacts of could seeding on the clouds. The lecturer cast doubt ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...views the issue from an opposite angle. she says, while it is compeletly possible t...
^^^
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the same method. On the other hand, the professor thinks that there are initial ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, conversely, finally, first, if, moreover, second, so, thus, whereas, while, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94074074074 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5463737362 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6923803984 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.615384615 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.