The passage and the lecture both deal with capability of flying in Pterosaurs which lived in the vicinity of dinasaurs. While the passage offers several arguments for Pterosaurs' disability of flying, the lecture is at odds with these reasons. The related disparities will be explored in the following paragraphs.
First, the text points out that powered flight is a kind of activity which significant energy is needed. Moreover, this giant animal was cold-blooded which represented slow metabolism and they were unable to produce considerable energy. The lecturer, on the other hand, rebuts this statement by saying that this animal had dense and hair-like covers which were look alike to fur. This structure is a typical of warm-blooded animal which need to sustain their high body temperature when the external condition is cold and chill. Thus, Pterosaurs was similar to warm-blooded and they would have been able to supply enough energy for flying.
Secondly, the reading passage states that those animals who have light weight, are able to fly and being extremely heavy and humongous do not allow Pterosaurs to flap their wings. The professor opposes this idea by asserting that they have a special anatomic characteristic which helped them to fly. Actually, Pterosaurs' bone had hollow instead of being solid and this feature had given animal a chance to keep their weight low. So, they would have had ability to flap their wings in air.
Thirdly, the passage contends that those animals who can fly, have the power of taking off from the field such as birds. The structure of fossilized bone has displayed that this gigantic reptile had not vigorous and all-powerful muscles so they could not have been able to fly. On the contrary, the lecturer, refutes this opinion by pointing out that there is difference between birds and this reptile. Actually, birds use two hind legs for walking on the ground whereas Pterosaurs have been able to use four legs. So, they had a capability of pushing off the grounds and launch themselves into the air
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
Suggestion: lightweight
...sage states that those animals who have light weight, are able to fly and being extremely he...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, whereas, while, kind of, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 339.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04719764012 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55771435043 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 145.348785872 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566371681416 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7331114831 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.647058824 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9411764706 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05882352941 7.06452816374 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421566529201 0.272083759551 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129015990786 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684834208893 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234796723607 0.162205337803 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691242308169 0.0443174109184 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.