TPO47 integrated

Essay topics:

TPO47-integrated

The passage and the lecture are both about the flight ability of pterosaurs. The author presents three theories to support that these dinosaurs were not able to fly. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes all the mentioned notions in the text and believes that these creatures may capable of flight due to several reasons.

In the passage, the writer begins by stating that since pterosaurs were probably cold-blooded animals, they were unable to provide the required energy of flying. The professor, however, asserts that they had a dense hair-like covering, or maybe had fur that belong to warm-blooded creatures. Therefore, pterosaurs did not have problems providing the energy needed to fly.

The author also claims that these dinosaurs were too heavy for flying. Conversely, the lecturer argues this viewpoint, mentioning that the anatomy of pterosaurs was specific, and despite their huge body frame, they were lightweight because they had hollow bones. As a result, pterosaurs were able to fly.

Finally, the writer points out that since pterosaurs had small and weak back muscles, they could not run fast or jump high enough to lunch into the air. In contrast, the lecturer states that there were crucial differences between these creatures and birds. For instance, birds only can use two limbs for jumping, however, pterosaurs could use four limbs to run or jump. So they were able to run fast enough or jump high enough into the air.

Votes
Average: 8 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 13 12
No. of Words: 238 250
No. of Characters: 1173 1200
No. of Different Words: 133 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.928 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.929 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.367 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 84 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 61 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 37 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.308 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.568 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.769 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.367 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.586 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.043 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4