TPO48
Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage.
The passage and the talk both discuss factors which have affected the populations of frog. The passage claims that declining the number of frogs can be solved by three proposed methods. The lecture, in contrast, not only refutes the author's assessments, but also asserts that the announced claims run counter to the statements of the reading. The lecturer puts forth three reasons to categorically reject whatever mentioned in the passage.
The first allegation of the reading against which the professor argues is that the prohibition of harmful chemical pesticides by farmers can have a remarkable effect on the number of frogs. Nevertheless, the lecturer highlights the fact that this solution is impractical. He further asserts that farmers significantly rely on these pesticides in order to protect their crops and compete in terms of economical with the farmers of other areas. Thus this point proves the main idea of the reading wrong.
Second, according to the passage, applying antifungal medication and killing the fungus with the heat in on a large scale tend to protect the population of frog from infection; however, the speaker finds this idea debatable. She gives support to her opinion by stating that this method should be applied to each individual frog. Also it this process should be repeated for new generation again and again, which is really expensive and complicated.
Finally, the lecturer contradicts the mistaken belief in the reading that frog population decline is because of human activities, which threaten the wetland habitats. The lecturer, on the other hand, mentions that human beings’ water usage is not the biggest threat. He points out that global warming is the factor which impacts water and wetland on the Earth.
In summary, the points made by the professor in the lecture cast doubts on the reading. Lack of evidence in the claim of the reading, really call into question the validity of this passage. It is of the utmost importance in consumption of information to not take all at face value.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...an be solved by three proposed methods. The lecture, in contrast, not only refutes ...
^^^
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...unter to the statements of the reading. The lecturer puts forth three reasons to ca...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... whatever mentioned in the passage. The first allegation of the reading against...
^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...omical with the farmers of other areas. Thus this point proves the main idea of the ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es the main idea of the reading wrong. Second, according to the passage, applyi...
^^^
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...uld be applied to each individual frog. Also it this process should be repeated for ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, really, second, so, thus, in contrast, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 333.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17417417417 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70978385007 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7598827197 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.352941176 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5882352941 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278185013614 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775633821334 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834156443114 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135470334341 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749098128689 0.0443174109184 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 63.6247240618 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.