TPO48W1
The reading passage lists three methods to help solve the problem of the declining frog populations, while the speaker thinks all three approaches are not practical.
First of all, the reading passage insists that the government could set up laws to ban the use of pesticides which are harmful for frogs in the areas near the frog habitats. However, the speaker believes that this method is not fair for those farmers who live near the frog habitats since they may become less competitive. To be more specific, if regulations are established, they might have to lose some crops, reducing their yields.
Second, the reading passage suggests that antifungal medication and treatments could be used in a large scale to treat the fungus problem which will otherwise lead to dehydration of frogs. In contrast, the speaker thinks that it is too complicated and expensive to implement. Such medication and treatments have to be done individually, which is very complex and time-consuming. And also, those treatments can't prevent frogs from passing off the illnesses to their offsprings. So we need to do it over and over again.
Finally, the reading passage gives their advice that by protecting the key frog habitat from excessive water use, the problem of declining frog populations could be solved since frogs are dependent on water. On the contrary, the speaker holds an opposite opinion. He believes that it will not save frogs' life. Actually, the amount of water decreases mainly because of global warming instead of the excessive water use. Therefore, protecting the habitats from avoiding the water draining off will not solve the problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e-consuming. And also, those treatments cant prevent frogs from passing off the illn...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15671641791 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6895609356 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0685813392 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7142857143 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465231284002 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138553571482 0.0996497079465 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124570460018 0.0662205650399 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260382505808 0.162205337803 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107632942434 0.0443174109184 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.