tpo5
The reading and the lecture are both about bassive stone byldings that have many rooms and three our four houses. The author of the reading believes that there are three possible reason for using these builldings but the lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the lecture. He thinks that all reason that alluded in reading are not convicing.
First of all, the author claims that these buildings are used for living and many numbers of people lived there.This point is challenged by the lecture. He says that residental place needs many fire places for daily cooking, but there was only fire place for ten family there. Also there was not enough room for that people for living.
Secondly,the author stats that these buildings are used for storing food. He argus that maintan grain mazie there for a long period of time. This argument is rebutted by the lecture. He suggests that they do not discover any evidence in excavation for storing food.
Finally, the author mentions that they use this houses as the ceremonial center. He is of the opinion that archeologists found a mound that contain many puts in it. The lecture, on the other handf, feels that it is not true. He [puts forth the idea that in this mound there is a lot of material of sand, stone and other buildings materials, so this place was not a ceremonial center. Furthermore there is not good evidence for usuing this place for special ceremony.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... and many numbers of people lived there.This point is challenged by the lecture. He ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...s only fire place for ten family there. Also there was not enough room for that peop...
^^^^
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... for that people for living. Secondly,the author stats that these buildings are u...
^^^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...at maintan grain mazie there for a long period of time. This argument is rebutted by the lectu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: ']' seems to be missing
...er handf, feels that it is not true. He [puts forth the idea that in this mound t...
^
Line 7, column 385, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...this place was not a ceremonial center. Furthermore there is not good evidence for usuing t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.245421245421 0.261695866417 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.168498168498 0.158904122519 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0769230769231 0.0723426182421 106% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0512820512821 0.0435111971325 118% => OK
Pronouns: 0.040293040293 0.0277247811725 145% => OK
Prepositions: 0.153846153846 0.128828473217 119% => OK
Participles: 0.040293040293 0.0370669169778 109% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.26466489264 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0 0.0208969081088 0% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.120879120879 0.128158765124 94% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.010989010989 0.0114777025283 96% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1424.0 1645.83664459 87% => OK
No of words: 248.0 271.125827815 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74193548387 6.08160592843 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04852973271 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.286290322581 0.374372842146 76% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.20564516129 0.287516216867 72% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.133064516129 0.187439937562 71% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0645161290323 0.113142543107 57% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26466489264 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512096774194 0.539623497131 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.1254944797 53.8517498576 89% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.5333333333 21.7502111507 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3609421723 49.3711431718 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9333333333 132.220823453 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5333333333 21.7502111507 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.878197800319 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.39072847682 177% => OK
Readability: 37.0978494624 50.5018328374 73% => OK
Elegance: 1.69014084507 1.90840788429 89% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.128454441171 0.142949733639 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0798537410569 0.0787303798458 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.56200421387 0.631733273073 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13463484667 0.139662658121 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.368276203528 0.414875509568 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0330656815308 0.0530846634433 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.26048565121 211% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 0.0 3.49668874172 0% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 3.1766004415 220% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.