TPO6-integrated
The article states that communal online encyclopedias are one of resources for users in the internet and they have some differences with traditional printed encyclopedia, and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that the online encyclopedia have other aspect which are good and refutes each of author’s reasons.
First, the reading claims that the online encyclopedia are edited or created by individuals who do not have academic educations and they maybe often include incorrect information or inaccurate knowledge, and the professor opposes the point by saying that if there are mistakes and errors in the printed encyclopedia they will remain for decades but on the internet source, users can easily correct the wrong and fallacious information which are in the online encyclopedias.
Second, the article posits that on the internet, vandals and hackers have an opportunity to fabricate the original entry. In contrast, the professor says that online encyclopedias have recognized the format and other people do not able to fabricate the original information. According to the professor, information and data in the online encyclopedia are reliable.
Third, the reading says that online encyclopedias concentrate too recurrent and too great a depth which produces an inexact impression of what is important. The professor casts doubt on this point by explaining that traditional printed encyclopedias are limited space to collect many information but on the internet source there is not such problems like them and this matter help people to earn helpful information for their works and researches in plentiful fields when they use online encyclopedias.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...yclopedias are limited space to collect many information but on the internet source ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[2]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much information', 'a good deal of information'.
Suggestion: much information; a good deal of information
...yclopedias are limited space to collect many information but on the internet source there is not...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59302325581 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04484687339 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 123.345487858 49.2860985944 250% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 180.375 110.228320801 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.25 21.698381199 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.3589403974 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.08 53.8541721854 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.0289183223 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.2367328918 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 10.7273730684 196% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.2008830022 187% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.