Both the lecture and the talk are about the golden frog, a small amphibian threatened by a kind of fungus. Having considered this, the author provides three possible solutions to protect the golden frog against the fungus. The lecturer, however, categorically refutes all the reasons mentioned in the passage and explains why they are not effective.
First, the author claims that since the fungus is vulnerable to a kind of bacterium, they can use this bacterium species on the frog's body skin to diminish the fungus. The speaker, rebuts this notion, citing that this bacterium generates some special chemical on the frog's skin which attacks the fungus and destroys them. Nevertheless, after a while, the chemical also affects the bacterium and in this situation, the bacterium stops producing the chemical.
Second, it is mentioned in the text that golden frogs can be bred in captivity, separated from the infected frogs. Therefore, when they will be released into the environment, they can reproduce healthy frogs. The lecturer, on the contrary, denies this solution, suggesting that it is highly probable that other animals carry the fungus and make the captivated frogs infected. She adds that also when the captivated frogs are released in the habitats, they are likely to be infected by disease frogs.
Finally, the author states that golden frogs can be protected using a natural defense in which the temperature of their body will go up due to the reaction against the fungus. The lecturer, conversely, claims that although this mechanism can diminish the fungus, it is dangerous for the frog because heating the body needs a lot of energy. In this situation, losing an enormous amount of energy, frogs will be weak and it leads to their death resulted from other factors rather than the fungal infection. In this way, frogs no longer stay strong and healthy.
- It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life 88
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is over 73
- cheatgrass is an invasive species of grass that is causing problems in North American fields 83
- The purpose of television is to educate not to entertain 76
- Governments should spend more money in sponsoring arts than in athletics like state Olympics team 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, however, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, while, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 308.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13961038961 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57095914317 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519480519481 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6273849772 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.071428571 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.562524481892 0.272083759551 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207707448558 0.0996497079465 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10800719441 0.0662205650399 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.351056755723 0.162205337803 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319594439847 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.