tpo9
Both, the reading and the lecture, talk about the alternative of using hydrogen as replacement of oil as cars’ main source of power cars. While the reading states that hydrogen is a plausible and promising option, the professor explains that the author’s expectations are too high, and refutes each reason presented, casting doubts in the author’s beliefs.
Firstly, the reading points out that the hydrogen is an almost infinite source of power, which could be found in sources like natural gas or water. Notwithstanding, the lecturer disproves this by stating that hydrogen is not the solution to the problem, owing to that substance cannot be obtained directly from those sources, on the contrary, it is needed a complex process to get it. The elevated difficulty of the process makes it costly.
Secondly, the text argues that the hydrogen solve the uncountable pollution problems related to the use of oil as combustible. Nonetheless, the professor mention that actually it is not correct that argument, because all the industrial activity required to obtain the hydrogen have to be energized using oil or coal, which release high level of pollution when they are burned.
Finally, the writer remarks that this solution is economically competitive, due to people save money using it. However, the lecturer remarks the weakness of this point, noting that creating the hydrogen has a high cost of operations, therefore, the final cost is far to be cheap. Furthermore, to obtain an effective chemical reaction inside the hydrogen-based engine, one of the components needed it the platinum, which is rare and costly product and the efforts made to find an alternative to replace it, have not got promising outcomes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...culty of the process makes it costly. Secondly, the text argues that the hydro...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28417266187 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90720706283 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575539568345 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.61184102 49.2860985944 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.9 110.228320801 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8 21.698381199 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9 7.06452816374 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.