traditional encyclopedias
The reading and listening passages are discussing communal encyclopedias. The article states that the traditional encyclopedias are valuable than online communal encyclopedias. The author provides three problems in online encyclopedias for the support. However, the speaker mentions that online encyclopedias are more valuable compared to printed encyclopedias and problems are much small related to what it gives us, and refutes each of the problems mentions in the article.
First, the speaker mentions that there are more chances to correct errors in online encyclopedias. In addition, if the error made in traditionally printed encyclopedias, they last long for decays and it is not possible to correct them. Moreover, there are some errors found in traditional encyclopedias even encyclopedias made by trained experts. This challenged the point made in the article that traditional encyclopedias do not have any error as they written by experts.
Second, the lecturer adds that in the problem of unauthorised entry and changes by a hacker, is solved by two strategies. In the first strategy, online encyclopedias have the feature of that it is only in reading format and any changes is not possible. The second strategy is to hire a special editor team, they pay attention to the online encyclopedias and remove unauthorised malicious changes. This point rebuts assertion made in the article that changes made in the original content of encyclopedias by a hacker is its drawback.
Third, The speaker mentions that problem of content in online encyclopedias like it has broad and too in-depth content is not its disadvantage, it is its strongest advantage over traditionally printed encyclopedias although. She elaborates this by saying that in traditional encyclopedias there is a problem of space so experts have to think what to add or not. but, in online encyclopedias, it is not a problem its benefit of that and with that, it can cover most of the content in depth. This reject point made in the reading that, a broad topic is difficult in focusing particular point and considering the importance of the topic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ble than online communal encyclopedias. The author provides three problems in onlin...
^^^
Line 7, column 363, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...perts have to think what to add or not. but, in online encyclopedias, it is not a p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 338.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30177514793 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18188079497 2.5805825403 123% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.440828402367 0.540411800872 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 572.4 419.366225166 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5584069584 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393283419629 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151637585972 0.0996497079465 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139861032204 0.0662205650399 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262300409562 0.162205337803 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731581959816 0.0443174109184 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.