business of fossils
The reading and listening discussing buying and selling of fossils, and their consequences. The article states that this buying and selling of fossils is an unfortunate development for both scientists and the general public. The author provides three reasons for support. However, the speaker explains that the business of fossil absolutely outweigh its disadvantages and refute each of the author's reason.
Firstly, the speaker mentions the general public, as because of the fossils business, small institutions can buy them and show to the public, like a small school, university. Because many fossils found, it leads to its business. So, it is not true that private collectors can buy fossils and the general public can not see that. This challenges the claim made in the reading that the public suffers because of fossils can not found in museums and their interest decline, too.
Secondly, the lecturer states that all the fossils first come to the hand of the scientist expert, they evaluate its values and examine fossil well. She also states that when private collector buy that fossils, before that they go to the scientists, so scientists did not miss any crucial facts of the fossils. They have first access to the newly found fossils. This rejects the point made in the article that scientists lose access because of private collector buy it.
Finally, the speaker explains that sometimes private collector damage to the rare fossils. She suggests that it is better that scientists should find more fossils. If they find more fossils then they can find many fossils like other and rarity does not become a problem for that. This rebuts the assertion made in the reading that commercial fossils collectors ofter destroy fossils, and these fossils contain valuable evidence.
In conclusion, the lecturer effectively casts doubt on all the claims presented in the reading.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-30 | predatoros | 85 | view |
| 2022-10-12 | Prabesh Dhakal | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-04 | Uttama Shekhawat | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | SAPTORSHI GUPTA | 90 | view |
| 2022-06-30 | jaqenhghar1 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most experiences in our lives that seemed difficult at the time become valuable lessons for the future. Use reasons and specific examples to support our answer. 60
- traditional encyclopedias 60
- Twin studies 87
- image of Jane Austen 68
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...development for both scientists and the general public. The author provides three reasons for ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...both scientists and the general public. The author provides three reasons for suppo...
^^^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...n. Firstly, the speaker mentions the general public, as because of the fossils business, sm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...vate collectors can buy fossils and the general public can not see that. This challenges the c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_NNS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'more fossils than'?
Suggestion: more fossils than
... should find more fossils. If they find more fossils then they can find many fossils like other a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...more fossils. If they find more fossils then they can find many fossils like other a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20983606557 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51581613498 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491803278689 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7041837639 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4705882353 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9411764706 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27195191782 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852954188593 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091982280386 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131865829979 0.162205337803 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784566888542 0.0443174109184 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.