TV appearances by professors.
The professor in the lecture completely disagrees with the content of the passage. She states that if professors appear on television then that would have adverse effects rather than being advantageous to them.
Firstly she argues when a professor makes a TV appearance, it would create wrong impression among other scholarly fellow, considering him/her to be mere entertaining person instead of being serious about his work. The professor might not be invited to important conferences and even face difficulty in getting donations for his/her research work.
After this she explains that appearing on TV programs will waste lot of valuable time of professor. She cities preprogram preparations,rehearsal of content delivery and even appearance making as the main reasons for time consumption. Instead of this the professor could have focused on the research work, important university business activities and taking lectures, which would be more beneficial to university, students and to the professor itself.
At last she explains why general public wont be benefited to the extent as stated in the passage. She states that when a professor talks in any TV program he/she covers much more general aspect of the topic.Such content can also be delivered by tv show anchors themself .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ations for his/her research work. After this she explains that appearing on TV ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , rehearsal
...ssor. She cities preprogram preparations,rehearsal of content delivery and even appe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 26, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... itself. At last she explains why general public wont be benefited to the extent as stat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 208, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Such
...s much more general aspect of the topic.Such content can also be delivered by tv sho...
^^^^
Line 13, column 270, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...be delivered by tv show anchors themself .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 201.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48756218905 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05976238752 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.646766169154 0.540411800872 120% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2913478837 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.555555556 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131354018357 0.272083759551 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610886963791 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670068807089 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829026961624 0.162205337803 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341435590261 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.3589403974 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.